The U.S. State Department has recently released their
annual report on International Child Abduction. Below is our fifth post in a
series here focusing on the twelve countries classified as “demonstrating
patterns of noncompliance.” Today’s
country is the Dominican Republic.
Country
Summary: The Hague Abduction Convention has been in force
between the United States and the Dominican Republic since 2007. In 2017, the
Dominican Republic demonstrated a pattern of noncompliance. Specifically, the
Dominican Republic’s judicial branch regularly fails to implement and comply
with the provisions of the Convention. As a result of this failure, 20 percent
of requests for the return of abducted children under the Convention remained
unresolved for more than 12 months. On average these cases were unresolved for
six years and eight months. The Dominican Republic has been cited since 2014.
Initial
Inquiries: In 2017, the Department received three initial
inquiries from parents regarding possible abductions to the Dominican Republic
where no completed applications were submitted to the Department.
Central
Authority: The United States and the Dominican Central
Authorities have a strong and productive relationship that facilitates the
resolution of abduction cases under the Convention.
Voluntary
Resolution: The Convention states that central
authorities “shall take all appropriate measures to secure the voluntary return
of the child or to bring about an amicable resolution of the issues.” In 2017,
one abduction case was resolved through voluntary means.
Location:
The competent authorities regularly took appropriate steps to locate children
after a Convention application was filed. The average time to locate a child
was nine days.
Judicial
Authorities: Dominican judicial authorities
demonstrated a pattern of noncompliance, with serious delays at the appellate
level in deciding Convention cases. Cases that are appealed to higher courts
have taken more than four years to resolve.
Enforcement:
As a result of serious delays by the judicial authorities of the Dominican
Republic in deciding Convention cases, the United States is not aware of any
instances where law enforcement was asked to enforce a return order in 2017.
Department
Recommendations: The Department will continue its
engagement with relevant Dominican authorities to address the areas of concern
highlighted in this report.
Access:
In 2017, the U.S. Central Authority had one open access case under the
Convention in the Dominican Republic. This case was opened and initially filed
with the Dominican Central Authority in 2017. As of December 31, 2017, this
case remained open. No access cases have been pending with the Dominican
authorities for more than 12 months.