Jeremy
D. Morley
Will a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement protect a
U.S. citizen, who has signed a Form I-864 Affidavit of Support in furtherance
of a foreign spouse’s application for a U.S. permanent resident visa, against
the subsequent support claims of a foreign spouse upon a divorce?
A person who signs the support affidavit, pursuant to
Section 213A of the Immigration and Nationality Act, enters into a legally
enforceable contract with the U.S. Government to support the sponsored alien at
an annual income at the level of 125% of the Federal poverty line for a period
of time that is generally 10 years.
It is well established that the sponsored foreign
spouse is a third-party beneficiary of the contract. The form expressly
states that, “If you do not provide sufficient support to the person who
becomes a lawful permanent resident based on a Form I-864 that you signed, that
person may sue you for this support.”
Indeed, it has been held that the foreign spouse has
no duty to mitigate the damages by securing or even seeking employment. Wenfang
Liu v. Mund, 686 F.3d 418, 421-22 (7th Cir. 2012).
Nor is the obligation terminated upon a divorce. The
Form I–864 makes explicitly states that “divorce does not terminate
your obligations under this Form I–864.” Toure-Davis v. Davis, 2014 WL 1292228 (D.Md. 2014).
But what if the foreign spouse purports to waive that
right in a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement?
Most – but not all – of the cases on point hold that
the waiver will not be effective. See Patel,
2015 WL 13116649 (Minn.Dist.Ct.) (“A third party beneficiary is not a party to
a contract and any agreement between Plaintiff and Defendants would not modify
the Affidavit of Support. The agreement of all parties to the original contract
is required for a modification, oral or written. Defendants have presented no
evidence that the United States government agreed to a modification of the
Affidavit of Support or the Contract.”); Patel
v. Patel, 2015 WL 13116649 (Minn.Dist.Ct); Erler
v. Erler, 2014 WL 129222 (N.D. Cal. 2013); and Shah
v. Shah, 2014 WL 185914 (D. NJ 2014). But see Blain
v. Herrell, 2010 WL 2900432, (D. Haw. 2010) (suggesting
in dicta that rights under Form I-864 are in the nature of contractual rights
and may be waived).
However, in none of the cited cases was there an
express waiver of the Form I-864 Affidavit of Support obligation. Nonetheless,
in Shah, the court expressly insisted
that, “even if the parties' prenuptial agreement did purport to waive claims to
support under the I–864, the I–864 is nevertheless enforceable. The immigration
regulations set forth five circumstances that terminate a sponsor's support
obligations, and a prenuptial agreement or other waiver by the sponsored
immigrant does not terminate the obligation. 8 C.F.R. § 213a.2(e)(2).”